<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://wiki-archive.open311.org/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://wiki-archive.open311.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Waltersaegir</id>
		<title>Open311 - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki-archive.open311.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Waltersaegir"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki-archive.open311.org/Special:Contributions/Waltersaegir"/>
		<updated>2026-10-27T03:40:48Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.22.6</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki-archive.open311.org/Talk:San_Francisco</id>
		<title>Talk:San Francisco</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki-archive.open311.org/Talk:San_Francisco"/>
				<updated>2010-03-08T07:04:26Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Waltersaegir: /* What is a service? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The discussion page for San Francisco 311 technology&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== city_id should be domain name? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the city_id, it looks like the existing practice is to use the city's '''domain name''' (e.g. &amp;quot;sfgov.org&amp;quot;), not the city's URL.   I think the domain name is a better choice than the URL, and since this is also the existing practice, I suggest that the spec should say &amp;quot;domain name&amp;quot;, both in the prose of the city_id section, and in the descriptions of the arguments to the &amp;quot;Select Service&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Create Request&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;Status Update&amp;quot; commands.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Zestyping|Zestyping]] 05:51, 8 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What is a service? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I usually think of a &amp;quot;service&amp;quot; as something a government performs for its citizens.  But in the &amp;quot;Select Service&amp;quot; section, all the &amp;quot;service_name&amp;quot; attributes don't describe city services at all; they describe problems.  Should they describe services?  Or conversely, should the API be expressed in terms of problems that need solving?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Zestyping|Zestyping]] 05:55, 8 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I do agree that a &amp;quot;service&amp;quot; is something a government performs for its citizens, yet the user/taxpayer/voter thinks more personally subjective in terms of problems.  The government then needs to think in terms of resources-work centers-union groups to schedule and determine capacity availability and scheduling.  This might likely be additional back-end software to supports the 311 front-end.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Waltersaegir</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>