Views
Difference between revisions of "Talk:San Francisco"
Collaboration for an Open311 Standard
(Created page with 'The discussion page for San Francisco 311 technology') |
(→city_id should be domain name?: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The discussion page for San Francisco 311 technology | The discussion page for San Francisco 311 technology | ||
| + | |||
| + | == city_id should be domain name? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | For the city_id, it looks like the existing practice is to use the city's '''domain name''' (e.g. "sfgov.org"), not the city's URL. I think the domain name is a better choice than the URL, and since this is also the existing practice, I suggest that the spec should say "domain name", both in the prose of the city_id section, and in the descriptions of the arguments to the "Select Service", "Create Request", and "Status Update" commands. | ||
| + | [[User:Zestyping|Zestyping]] 05:51, 8 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:51, 7 March 2010
The discussion page for San Francisco 311 technology
city_id should be domain name?
For the city_id, it looks like the existing practice is to use the city's domain name (e.g. "sfgov.org"), not the city's URL. I think the domain name is a better choice than the URL, and since this is also the existing practice, I suggest that the spec should say "domain name", both in the prose of the city_id section, and in the descriptions of the arguments to the "Select Service", "Create Request", and "Status Update" commands. Zestyping 05:51, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
